Monday, September 10, 2007

Today's Poetical Rant ...

I'm calling this one:

"The Unmoved Mover"

The penny fell out of my purse …
face down.

I saw it's blaze orange flash.

I leaned down to examine it.
Staring at the little piece of fate.

My hand reached out.
I caressed the shiny surface.

Thoughtfully, rolling the circle
between my fingers.

I placed it back on the sidewalk.

My penny rests there now.
It waits for you …

Heads up.

Back in the saddle ...

The Dispatch Rider has returned ... new blogs and posts starting soon! It's been too long my friends!

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

The Morning Afflatus . . .

"What constitutes the bulwark of our own liberty and independence? It is not our frowning battlements, our bristling sea coasts, the guns of our war steamers, or the strength of our gallant and disciplined army. These are not our reliance against a resumption of tyranny in our fair land. All of them may be turned against our liberties, without making us stronger or weaker for the struggle. Our reliance is in the love of liberty which God has planted in our bosoms. Our defense is in the preservation of the spirit which prizes liberty as the heritage of all men, in all lands, everywhere. Destroy this spirit, and you have planted the seeds of despotism around your own doors. Familiarize yourselves with the chains of bondage, and you are preparing your own limbs to wear them. Accustomed to trample on the rights of those around you, you have lost the genius of your independence, and become the fit subjects of the first cunning tyrant who rises." - Abraham Lincoln (from the Lincoln/Douglas debates)

Too cute to pass up:

Apple Appeal . . .


There's a rumor this morning that Apple's going to release a new version of the iPod (again). You'd think that they would want to fix the faulty screen on the Nano first . . . Apple admits to Nano faults

Just Another Iraqi Sunrise:

Well, at least someone has a plan:
Seized Letter Details Al Qaeda Plans in Iraq

The Miers Muck . . .

Aw c'mon Laura . . . is it possible your husband just made an(other) exceptionally bad choice?
Laura Bush: "Sexism" Charges May Be Hampering Miers Nomination

Wednesday, October 05, 2005

The Other-other Wars . . .

Morning Afflatus . . .


"Begin the morning by saying to thyself, I shall meet with the busy-body, the ungrateful, arrogant, deceitful, envious, unsocial. All these things happen to them by reason of their ignorance of what is good and evil. But I who have seen the nature of the good that it is beautiful, and of the bad that it is ugly, and the nature of him who does wrong, that it is akin to me, not only of the same blood or seed, but that it participates in the same intelligence and the same portion of the divinity, I can neither be injured by any of them, for no one can fix on me what is ugly, nor can I be angry with my kinsman, nor hate him, For we are made for co-operation, like feet, like hands, like eyelids, like the rows of the upper and lower teeth. To act against one another then is contrary to nature; and it is acting against one another to be vexed and to turn away." - Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"

Hard to Swallow Request of the Day:

"Shaped by a faith in God" (damnit, another Evangelical)

Wading through the Miers muck:
Just Bush's Type

Tuesday, October 04, 2005

"A Pit Bull in size 6 shoes"


Demystifying Miers

This we know . . . she is politically inchoate.

Despite an urge to do otherwise (cuz', damn - it'd be so easy!) . . . we found a "pretty" picture of Miers. It's probably best that Supreme Court justices not scare small children. (Just think of the sensitivities of little Jack Roberts).

Monday, October 03, 2005

Afternoon Afflatus . . .


"Because to the mortal creature generation is a sort of eternity and immortality and if, as has been already admitted, love is of the everlasting possession of the good, all men will necessarily desire immortality together with the good – wherefore love is of immortality."
-Plato

Who owns the Internet?

Passioned squabbles over who owns the Internet in a global power grab.

The response is in . . .

Washington, D.C. - House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today in response to President Bush's nomination of Harriet Miers to the United States Supreme Court:

"Now that the President has nominated White House Counsel Harriet Miers to succeed Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, it is time to ask the tough questions to determine Ms. Miers' positions on issues that affect all Americans.

"Justice O'Connor has played a pivotal role in preserving our civil liberties and Americans' right to privacy, including a woman's right to choose; Ms. Miers must face scrutiny on her positions on these matters. The Senate should seek full answers from Ms. Miers regarding respect for the Constitution, including limits on the Executive branch's power, the independence of the judiciary, civil rights, and the right to privacy. Ms. Miers has the burden of demonstrating that she shares Justice O'Connor's commitment to our freedoms, and is suitable for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.

"As the Senate undertakes its constitutional duty to advise and consent, I look forward to working with Leader Reid and other Senators to ensure that the views of the diverse House Democratic Caucus are taken into consideration in this process."

Saturday, October 01, 2005

The Morning Afflatus . . .


As members of the Minority Party, we do not have the primary authority to formulate the policy of our Government. But we do have the responsibility of rendering constructive criticism, of clarifying issues, of allaying fears by acting as responsible citizens.

As a woman, I wonder how the mothers, wives, sisters and daughters feel about the way in which members of their families have been politically mangled in Senate debate -- and I use the word 'debate' advisedly.

As a United States Senator, I am not proud of the way in which the Senate has been made a publicity platform for irresponsible sensationalism. I am not proud of the reckless abandon in which unproved charges have been hurled from this side of the aisle. I am not proud of the obviously staged, undignified countercharges that have been attempted in retaliation from the other side of the aisle.

I don't like the way the Senate has been made a rendezvous for vilification, for selfish political gain at the sacrifice of individual reputations and national unity. I am not proud of the way we smear outsiders from the Floor of the Senate and hide behind the cloak of congressional immunity and still place ourselves beyond criticism on the Floor of the Senate.

- From the "Declaration of Conscience" speech by Sen. Margaret Chase-Smith (R-ME).
----------------------------

Why we think Congress isn't getting along these days:

1. Congressional members no longer spend a majority of their time in Washington. They spend more time in their districts (this is both good and bad). However, because they're not in Washington . . . they don't have as much time to socialize outside of work. They no longer have a sense of "Hill-Community."

2. Lack of competition is leading to mediocrity and partisanship. Because of recent redistricting . . . there are too many safe seats, which often leads to a greater number of "true believers." Voters at the primary level are promoting more homogeneous candidates . . . who (in turn) have staunchly one-sided views. This is slowly eliminating the number of "problem solvers" on Capitol Hill.

3. Members are too busy with other duties (most notably fundraising and the never-ending campaigns) to truly explore topics and engage in intellectual debate. Wonder and curiosity are becoming increasingly anathema on the Hill. Lawmakers stay "safe" by working to keep their party base happy, which leads to a neglect of the larger issues that are very often at stake.

Reform?

A. Redistrct . . . create some competition between parties and individuals.

B. Encourage more Americans to participate in the primary process . . . get the moderates out there!

C. Increase socialization between the members (and parties) . . . Congressional retreats, family incentives, etc.

The Moody Blogs:


Graphing the changing moods of bloggers

Be sure to browse through the various "mood fluctuation" charts.

The hidden side of everything . . .

Let's put the Bill Bennett comment to rest.

The 7.4 Realistic Estimate

WHO tries to "calm" bird flu fear

While WHO's flu spokesman at the agency's Geneva headquarters did not say the 150 million prediction was wrong, he emphasized that 7.4 million deaths is a more realistic estimate.

Scientists have made predictions ranging from less than 2 million to 360 million. Last year, WHO's chief for the Asia-Pacific region predicted 100 million deaths, but until now that was the highest figure publicly mentioned by a WHO official.

"We're not going to know how lethal the next pandemic is going to be until the pandemic begins," WHO influenza spokesman Dick Thompson said Friday.

"You could pick almost any number" until then, he said, adding that WHO "can't be dragged into further scaremongering."

(Calm: not showing or feeling nervousness, anger, or other emotions.)

Not so calm: Bird flu now "resistant" to main drug

Friday, September 30, 2005

Even the IRS thinks it's gross . . .

AP: It's the shake that's causing quite a stir. An evangelical media watchdog group claims Pat Robertson is abusing his nonprofit status to market an "age-defying" diet drink.

For years, Robertson has been touting the shake on his Christian Broadcasting Network and giving away the recipe for free. Now, he's teamed up with the health food chain GNC to sell it nationally.

The recipe includes safflower oil, protein powder and vinegar. The head of the watchdog group, the Trinity Foundation, says the drink got big because it was promoted on donor-paid-for airtime. But Robertson says he's just exercising his right to start a business.

And there may be a legal fight. A bodybuilder who used the shake to help lose 200 pounds says Robertson's people led him to believe he'd be its national spokesman.

Robertson's attorney calls the man's allegations "bizarre and completely untrue."

More from WaPo

Download Pat's recipe for free